Boon vs PlanSwift

Looking for a PlanSwift alternative that isn’t stuck on Windows?

PlanSwift is a capable Windows-desktop takeoff tool with drag-and-drop assemblies — but it’s a per-PC install, and you drive the takeoff and build the estimate. Boon reads your drawings and specs together in the cloud, does the takeoff automatically, and returns a bid-ready package back in one Slack message.

Async path: drop a plan set in the email. Gandalf reads it and sends the bid-ready package back — no call required.

Boon vs PlanSwift: desktop takeoff vs. an AI estimator

PlanSwift is a desktop quantity-takeoff tool with assemblies that calculate material and labor — you drive the measurements. Boon runs the whole preconstruction loop with AI, in the cloud, and hands back a bid-ready package.

PlanSwift

Solid desktop takeoff you drive.

PlanSwift offers drag-and-drop takeoff and customizable assemblies that calculate material and labor. It’s a Windows desktop install, so it’s per-PC, and the measuring and estimate assembly are yours to do.

Boon

An AI estimator that returns the package.

Boon reads every sheet and every spec section as one document, flags spec ↔ drawing mismatches before they become change orders, and returns a bid-ready package to the same Slack channel — not a quantity file you have to import and finish.

Boon vs PlanSwift, side by side

A fair, factual comparison. PlanSwift facts below are from their site; Boon facts are from our live product pages.

Capability PlanSwift Boon
Automatic AI takeoff Drag-and-drop; you measure each condition Auto takeoff across trades
Reads drawings and specs together Takeoff from drawings Flags spec ↔ drawing mismatches
Cloud-based, any device Windows desktop install (per-PC) Cloud — works anywhere
Returns a bid-ready package You assemble the estimate in-app Bid-ready summary back in Slack
Publishes per-trade accuracy (F1) Not published Elec ≥ 0.90 · Mech ≥ 0.74 · Arch ≥ 0.85
Pricing One-time license + annual maintenance Pay for only what you use

PlanSwift positioning verified from planswift.com (2026-07-30). We only state facts we can source; if we can’t verify a claim, we leave it out.

Why teams switch to Boon

Four reasons estimators looking for a PlanSwift alternative land on Boon.

1 · Specs, not just drawings

It reads the specs too.

Boon treats drawings and specs as one document, the way an estimator does, and surfaces where they disagree before it becomes a change order. A takeoff off the drawings alone can miss that.

2 · Finished, not exported

A package, not a quantity file.

Instead of exporting quantities to import and finish elsewhere, Boon returns a bid-ready summary across trades — the last mile is done.

3 · No new tool

It lives in your Slack.

Drop a plan set in a project channel and the package comes back to the same channel. No new login, no per-seat rollout, no app to train the team on.

4 · Receipts, published

Per-trade accuracy on the record.

Electrical ≥ 0.90, mechanical ≥ 0.74, architectural ≥ 0.85. The Construction Vision Model is one foundation model trained across every trade — ask any vendor for their numbers.

Per-trade F1 receipts

F1 score is the standard accuracy metric for object detection. We publish ours. Ask any vendor for theirs.

Trade F1 (current) What it covers
Electrical ≥ 0.90 Receptacles, fixtures, panels, devices, conduit runs.
Mechanical ≥ 0.74 Ductwork, fittings, equipment, piping.
Architectural ≥ 0.85 Walls, doors, windows, fixtures, finishes.

Numbers are floors on real customer plan sets, not best-case demo decks. If a vendor won’t publish theirs, that’s the answer.

See the difference on your own plans.

Book a 20-minute call — we’ll provision your workspace and run your first takeoff on the call. Or email a plan set to plans@getboon.ai and Gandalf returns a bid-ready package back in Slack.