Boon vs STACK

Looking for a STACK alternative that lives where you already work?

STACK is a solid cloud takeoff-and-estimating platform with AI-assist and proposal building — but it’s another app your team logs into and drives. Boon reads your drawings and specs together, does the takeoff automatically, and returns a bid-ready package back in one Slack message.

Async path: drop a plan set in the email. Gandalf reads it and sends the bid-ready package back — no call required.

Boon vs STACK: a platform you drive vs. an estimator that returns the package

STACK is a cloud platform combining takeoff, estimating, and proposals with AI-assist for detecting elements. Boon runs the whole preconstruction loop with AI and hands back a bid-ready package — in the Slack you already use, with no new tool to roll out.

STACK

Full cloud platform you drive.

STACK combines cloud takeoff with an estimating module, proposals, and AI-assist for auto-counting elements. It’s a comprehensive platform — which also means a new app to roll out, train on, and drive to the finished bid.

Boon

An AI estimator that returns the package.

Boon reads every sheet and every spec section as one document, flags spec ↔ drawing mismatches before they become change orders, and returns a bid-ready package to the same Slack channel — not a quantity file you have to import and finish.

Boon vs STACK, side by side

A fair, factual comparison. STACK facts below are from their site; Boon facts are from our live product pages.

Capability STACK Boon
Reads drawings and specs together AI-assisted takeoff from drawings Flags spec ↔ drawing mismatches
Returns a bid-ready package You build the estimate + proposal in-app Bid-ready summary back in Slack
Works in your existing Slack (no new tool) Separate cloud platform + per-seat login Lives in Slack — nothing new to learn
One-message onboarding Per-seat sign-up + rollout One message; async or a 20-min call
Publishes per-trade accuracy (F1) Not published Elec ≥ 0.90 · Mech ≥ 0.74 · Arch ≥ 0.85
Pricing Annual subscription, per seat (tiered) Pay for only what you use

STACK positioning verified from stackct.com (2026-07-30). We only state facts we can source; if we can’t verify a claim, we leave it out.

Why teams switch to Boon

Four reasons estimators looking for a STACK alternative land on Boon.

1 · Specs, not just drawings

It reads the specs too.

Boon treats drawings and specs as one document, the way an estimator does, and surfaces where they disagree before it becomes a change order. A takeoff off the drawings alone can miss that.

2 · Finished, not exported

A package, not a quantity file.

Instead of exporting quantities to import and finish elsewhere, Boon returns a bid-ready summary across trades — the last mile is done.

3 · No new tool

It lives in your Slack.

Drop a plan set in a project channel and the package comes back to the same channel. No new login, no per-seat rollout, no app to train the team on.

4 · Receipts, published

Per-trade accuracy on the record.

Electrical ≥ 0.90, mechanical ≥ 0.74, architectural ≥ 0.85. The Construction Vision Model is one foundation model trained across every trade — ask any vendor for their numbers.

Per-trade F1 receipts

F1 score is the standard accuracy metric for object detection. We publish ours. Ask any vendor for theirs.

Trade F1 (current) What it covers
Electrical ≥ 0.90 Receptacles, fixtures, panels, devices, conduit runs.
Mechanical ≥ 0.74 Ductwork, fittings, equipment, piping.
Architectural ≥ 0.85 Walls, doors, windows, fixtures, finishes.

Numbers are floors on real customer plan sets, not best-case demo decks. If a vendor won’t publish theirs, that’s the answer.

See the difference on your own plans.

Book a 20-minute call — we’ll provision your workspace and run your first takeoff on the call. Or email a plan set to plans@getboon.ai and Gandalf returns a bid-ready package back in Slack.